![]() ![]() I wanted to see how each program handled specific issues like out of focus areas, though. I picked a photo that was fairly recent and a bit unusual for a portrait test, maybe… having a fairly short depth of field and such. But, that means that you are seeing each setting as I would actually use it in real life. Warning- as both programs save your prior actions and restart with those settings, I was unable to use just the default settings for either. ![]() I hope that these versions are clear enough for you to see the differences which happened between each program, and so that you can pick for yourself which one you would use more. I purposefully didn’t do any cloning cleanup, to see if there was any difference in how each program reacted to the problems (in this case, some dry skin flakes near the child’s mouth). I actually adjusted exposure and hue in Lightroom before porting the photo into Photoshop. ![]() I was very excited about doing such a test, and decided that to make it fair, the only differences would be in the skin softening layer. On suggestion from Kevin from Nik Software, I agreed to try out the Dynamic Skin Softener filter in Color Efex Pro against Imagenomic’s Portraiture, which has been my standby for skin softening for a while now. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |